A 2025 Nevada law restricts when a family court can force a child into reunification therapy or a reunification camp, raises the bar for expert testimony on abuse, and requires new training for judges. Here is how it affects a Las Vegas custody case.
If your custody case involves allegations of domestic violence or child abuse, a recent change in Nevada law may affect what a judge can order. Senate Bill 275, which took effect on July 1, 2025, places new limits on court ordered reunification treatment, tightens the standards for expert testimony, and requires additional training for judges and court professionals. For a Las Vegas parent worried about being separated from a child, the practical impact is significant.
Reunification treatment refers to therapy or programs designed to rebuild a relationship between a child and a parent the child resists or rejects. In some cases this took the form of intensive, multi day programs, sometimes called reunification camps, that removed a child from one parent and placed the child with the other to force contact. Critics argued that these programs could cut a child off from a parent the child felt safe with, often during the most contested part of a child custody and support dispute.
Under the new law, a Nevada court generally cannot order a child into reunification treatment that is built on isolating the child from a parent or on coercion, and cannot remove a child from a parent solely to repair a strained relationship with the other parent. The restriction is aimed at programs that lack credible scientific support for their safety and effectiveness. The goal is to stop a custody tool from being used in a way that places a child at risk, while still allowing healthy, voluntary efforts to rebuild a parent and child bond.
SB 275 also raises the bar for who can testify about domestic violence and child abuse. Testimony on these issues is expected to come from professionals with genuine clinical training and experience in that area, rather than from someone without the right background. For a Las Vegas family, that means a claim of abuse, or a defense against one, should be supported by qualified evidence that a judge can weigh carefully.
The law does not ban every effort to repair a parent and child relationship. Voluntary counseling and appropriate, safe steps to rebuild trust remain available, and a court can still consider the full history between a parent and child. What changed is the use of forced programs that separate a child from a protective parent without solid evidence behind them. Parents who want to restore a damaged relationship can still pursue that through safe channels, including mediation and alternative dispute resolution where appropriate.
The law directs the Administrative Office of the Courts to provide ongoing education on domestic violence, child abuse, and best practices in family court, and to offer that training to other court connected professionals such as evaluators and mediators. The aim is a bench that better understands the dynamics of abuse when deciding custody. Over time, that should mean more consistent handling of these issues across the Clark County family law docket.
If you are heading into a custody dispute where safety is a concern, this law gives you a stronger footing to oppose a forced reunification program and to insist that abuse evidence be evaluated by qualified experts. It also matters if you are seeking a modification of an existing order based on new safety concerns. Every case turns on its own facts, so the smartest move is to talk through your situation early. For a free confidential consultation, call Helping Hand at (702) 605-6347.
Free, confidential consultation. No obligation.
Senate Bill 275 took effect on July 1, 2025. It applies to family court matters in Nevada, including custody cases in Clark County, and changes how courts handle reunification treatment and abuse evidence.
A court can still support safe and voluntary efforts to rebuild a parent and child relationship. What the law restricts are forced programs that isolate a child from a protective parent or that lack credible evidence of safety and effectiveness.
Yes. The law expects testimony on domestic violence and child abuse to come from professionals with appropriate clinical training and experience, which helps a judge weigh that evidence more reliably.
If safety is an issue in your case, the law gives you a stronger basis to challenge a forced reunification program and to require qualified expert evidence. A family law attorney can explain how it applies to your specific facts.